View Full Version: W - news and views

ioanzone >>'W' >>W - news and views


<< Prev | Next >>

Gaffer'sGirl- 09-19-2008

Oh yeah! Me, too. I'd love to see him in some more substantial (and larger) roles and can't wait for Moonacre. I'm just hoping that W will be seen by many and give him more exposure. . . um. . .er :blush2: I guess this isn't Mutiny or S & G or LITTC, so perhaps I should say publicity or go to the Alley. :naughty .

Shipmate- 09-19-2008

Maybe that would be a good idea,GG! :rotf:

Gaffer'sGirl- 09-24-2008

There is supposed to be a sneak view of W on The Insider tonight. I'm going to try to get it on DVD, but I don't know if it will work. Either way I'll let you all know if there is a Ioan clip. Well, when I watched it, I didn't notice a shot of Ioan, although there is one that I wasn't sure who it was. When I get the chance I'll review that shot and see who it was.

midnightmagicgirl- 09-25-2008

from the pictures and clips all I can say is omg his hair!!! even Tony Blairs hair is not that blonde looking what have they done!

StevieT- 10-04-2008

Agree about Tone never being that blonde, but from the first these pics, it doesn't look so bad......maybe it's the way the sun catches his hair dye/wig? (click to enlarge) (These pics are from an interesting article in today's Weekend Guardian about the past relationship between Bush and Stone, but it doesn't mention Ioan, bar the pics. http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2008/oct/04/oliver.stone.george.bush )

Gaffer'sGirl- 10-04-2008

A real first look. Thanks Stevie. I'm glad he doesn't have that hair in real life, but looks kind of like Mr. Blair.

Shipmate- 10-04-2008

Thanks for posting those,Stevie. I saw a nice new trailer last night for the film,but it zoomed along pretty fast. Didn't catch sight of Mr. I in it!!!!! Also, there was a piece on "Nightline" last night interviewing Oliver Stone. Very nice,but it didn't really say anything new that we haven't seen right here on IZ.------------------------------HURRY UP,OCTOBER 17th, I neeeeeeeeed my Ioan-new-movie-fix!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :bow: :bow:

Frances- 10-04-2008

Agreed on Tony Blair's hair being darker than they seemingly make it out to be in W, but perhaps it's really just the light in the pics we've seen so far that makes it look that way... :dunno Thanks for the scans, Stevie. It's good to have a look at a couple of scenes from the movie.

StevieT- 10-06-2008

The film's official website http://wthefilm.com/ - check out Ioan!

Shipmate- 10-06-2008

Thank you,General,very nice web site,for sure. Just 12 more days 'til showtime!!!!!

StevieT- 10-07-2008

The critics first impressions of 'W'...... Oliver Stone's unusual and inescapably interesting "W." feels like a rough draft of a film it might behoove him to remake in 10 or 15 years.” (Todd McCarthy, Variety) “Stone bores us to tears with dreary docu-style scenes of White House meetings in the run-up to the Iraq war. The scenes feel accurate, to a fault; they capture everyone's policy positions correctly, but they lack any poetry or tragic drama.” (Patrick Goldstein, L.A. Times) “Someone should ask Oliver why it's always so dark in the White House meeting rooms -- is that a metaphor or was he trying to disguise how little money he had to spend on the sets?” (Patrick Goldstein, L.A. Times) “For a film that could have been either a scorching satire or an outright tragedy, "W." is, if anything, overly conventional, especially stylistically. The picture possesses dramatic and entertainment value, but beyond serious filmgoers curious about how Stone deals with all this president's men and women, it's questionable how wide a public will pony up to immerse itself in a story that still lacks an ending.” (Todd McCarthy, Variety) “It's a gutsy movie but not necessarily a good one. Its greatest strength is that it wants to talk about what's on our minds right now and not wait for historians.” (Kirk Honeycutt, Hollywood Reporter) wants to let the facts speak for themselves. But do they? It's all too easy, too pat. Can George W. Bush really be solved in two-plus hours?” (Kirk Honeycutt, Hollywood Reporter) “Despite a strong, compelling and entertaining turn from Josh Brolin, as both the younger and older President Bush, "W." is too brief and sketchy to qualify as a comprehensive chronicle of the 43rd President of the U.S.” (Emanuel Levy, www.emanuellevy.com) “As a film, “W.” represents a passable entertainment, one that's easy to take and be moderately engaged in. However, lacking real bite and criticism, and mostly rehashing facts that are known about Bush fils' earlier life, Stone’s new work is not strong enough to occupy the Op-Ed pages or stir controversy among viewers.” (Emanuel Levy, www.emanuellevy.com) “The movie is utterly plausible, well-acted by a top-notch ensemble (except for a too-broad Thandie Newton as Condoleeza Rice) and surprisingly balanced, compassionate and even-handed. Somehow the film lacks the urgency of its own making.” (Anne Thompson, Variety) “You're supposed to say ‘this is great but why isn't it better?’ Because it's about a fairly shallow man, for one thing, and the facts are the facts. On top of which cagey Oliver is holding his cards to his chest and making you wait for the turnaround of the last ten or twelve minutes, which pays off (or at least paid off for me) in a way that -- seriously, no jive -- is something close to astonishing.” (Jeffrey Wells, hollywood-elsewhere.com) “I came out saying to myself, as Bush himself says to himself at the finale, ‘What just happened?’ By the last shot you are sold because the anger is gone and you're left with this stunned and oddly tragic figure saying to himself, ‘This is how my life turned out?’” (Jeffrey Wells, hollywood-elsewhere.com) “My instinct is that a movie that has no natural ending is problematic ... and that even doing the film in almost real-time, that another month in the editing room would have helped some third act pacing issues. It's not like I can sit and point to specific things I would cut or complain about instinctually. But it gets long as you pass the halfway mark.” (David Poland, The Hot Blog) “I like the movie. It is not Strangelove in any way. It doesn’t aspire to be. We laugh at the familiar and it is often funny, but it is not a comedy, really. It’s a life, unexpected. But the Big Theme appears, on this viewing, to be missing in action.” (David Poland, The Hot Blog) -- Reactions compiled by Stephanie Lysaght (LA Times 6.10.08) http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2008/10/oliver-stones-w.html

jessd411- 10-07-2008

Darn, I was starting to think W. might be a return to form for Oliver Stone. Guess not. :???:

Gaffer'sGirl- 10-08-2008

Still sounds like it will be interesting to see how Stone approached the story. Not sure I'd make it all the way to Seattle for this, but if it plays in my local area, I'm going.

Frances- 10-08-2008

Though I'm afraid that some historical perspective would have been beneficial to this movie and that, therefore, it would have been better produced in 4 or 5 years, I'm still curious to see how Stone approached the story and I think I'll go see W.

StevieT- 10-09-2008

Here we have it, then....... ".....and Ioan Gruffudd makes a brief appearance as Tony Blair." http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2008/10/09/bfw109.xml

Forumer™ is Voted #1 Free Forum Hosting provider
Build your own community today with the largest message board hosting company.