View Full Version: Old BBC Interview with Ioan

ioanzone >>King Arthur >>Old BBC Interview with Ioan


<< Prev | Next >>

Frances- 10-03-2007
Old BBC Interview with Ioan
Ioan interviewed by BBC's Stella Papamichael on July 16, 2004. ********** Ioan Gruffudd came to prominence as TV's favourite seafaring fop Horatio Hornblower, although he also featured as a dandy boy in Wilde and the much more manly Fifth Officer Harold Godfrey Lowe in Titanic. Megabucks producer Jerry Bruckheimer first came across him on casting rounds for Black Hawk Down and gave him a small role as Lt John Beales. The Welshman obviously made an impression, as Bruckheimer later offered him the much-coveted role of Lancelot in Antoine Fuqua's big budget retelling of the Arthurian legend, King Arthur. How did you feel about this radical re-telling of the Arthurian legend? I think that's the beauty of these stories: that you can make an Excalibur and you can make our version of King Arthur because it's a story that's evolved and been embellished over the centuries. Do you subscribe to the theory that King Arthur was a Welshman? Yes! I still believe to this day that Arthur was a Welshman. But no, there's this 6th century poet who speaks about this Roman commander who was at this war and that's what we're describing in this film - Lucius Artorius Castus, who was a real person. But certainly a lot of the names of the knights have come from these famous Welsh fables, and in one of the books all the knights are named, and there's over a hundred of them at least. So I'm very familiar with the legend. What's your favourite telling of it? A Spaceman In King Arthur's Court, which is an old Disney film. Or Excalibur. You had to make unusual preparations for this role, didn't you? Apparently it took you quite a while to grow that little beard... Yes, I think it took me about three months to grow that little scraggly one I had. And being Celtic, it turned out red, so I had to get it painted in every day to get that black effect. And what's the story behind those lovely eyelashes? Ah. I made the very foolish error of deciding to be one of the vainest knights of them all and so I decided to curl my eyelashes every morning. Unfortunately I was caught out by Ray Winstone one morning, and, as you can imagine, word got around very quickly. I soon become known as Sir Lashalot! You tried on a kilt too, didn't you? Oh, yes. Yes. I see where this is... When I went to the costume fitting, Penny Rose had put Hugh Dancy, who plays Galahad, in a kilt and it worked with him - he really looks great in a kilt - but she put me in a kilt and I looked like a drag queen! So I just decided to go with the leather trousers, leather boots, and a leather tunic, and chainmail on the arms to, you know, make me look a little bit more masculine. And then I went and spoilt it all by curling my eyelashes. Aside from the soft eyelashes, this version of Sir Lancelot has quite an edge to him, doesn't he? Yes. The way David had written it in the script he was a much darker, more brooding, angrier character. All he's known throughout his life is killing and warring, so it was pretty obvious from the writing how to go about playing him. I enjoyed the fact that he is this darker character and different from the traditional telling to the story of him as this gallant, noble knight of knights in shining armour. I think he becomes a much more realistic character, and a more human character. This was a very physical role for you. Did it sometimes feel like hard work? All the guys would admit that, as much as it was hard work every day being on the back of a horse, it was also quite exhilarating. Exhilarating? It's one of the best ways to clear the cobwebs from the night before, certainly, just to get on a horse. And there's no real acting involved when you're doing that. You're in your costume and you're on the back of a horse and you've got Hadrian's Wall built there for you, so you don't have to imagine it. And the physical aspect was - for me anyway - much more exhilarating than it was hard work. You must also be exhilarated about landing the role of Mr Fantastic in Fantastic Four? I'm delighted and I'm grateful. I'm grateful for the fact that I was in this film because I'm sure that was a huge element of me getting that part. What do you say to the people who think you're too young for the part? Well, I mean, there's always makeup, isn't there? http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2004/07/16/ioan_gruffudd_king_arthur_interview.shtml

Shipmate- 10-03-2007

Frances! You're really bringing out a good number of the rare old chestnuts today, aren't you?!! THANKS!!!!!!! I LOVE 'em...............the last line of the above is SO funny too!

Bonita- 10-03-2007

Thanks Frances I havent gotten to see this one... til now

Gaffer'sGirl- 10-03-2007

I find that last line funny too, Shipmate. Thanks Frances.

SusieD- 10-19-2007

Thanks frances! Wow you find some great stuff. I just recently bought the Directors cut of "King Arthur" and would have to say that it's much better than the theatrical version. Personally, the moments that must have hit the cutting room floor were, to me, the crucial moments that explain the film a lot better. For eg; you get to find out where the knights came from in the opening (Ioan's beautiful lilting voice). It also develops the relationships between the characters a lot better. If you can get hold of a copy I highly recommend it to you. I didn't liike the film on first viewing because I was disappointed that it wasn't the Arthur story as we know it, but once I got over that and watched the director's cut I loved it! Mmm...............didn't know about the curling eyelash thing. What a scream...Sir Lashalot (priceless) :razz: :love: Susie D

Gaffer'sGirl- 10-20-2007

Susie, I have both versions and there are a few scenes in the theatrical version I wish they would have left in the Director's cut. One being the scene where the knights are camped at night in the rain and talking. It adds to the character development. Like you, I basically enjoyed the Director's cut more, but my wish is that they would have added scenes to the original and not taken any away.

StevieT- 10-20-2007

I agree with you, ladies, the best version of KA would have been to merge both the TV and the DC, particularly to leave the scene you mention, GG, in the DC! Ooh, I have now been washed with a desire to watch KA, which i haven't done for many months - I knew there was a reason I was letting that ironing pile up! Time to change my banner again, too, now the Boy's home......

Frances- 10-20-2007

I also have both versions of KA, the theatrical and the DC. I liked the DC better but I wish it were an uncut version of the movie as there are scenes from the theatrical version (the one where the knights are camped at night in the rain and talking that GG mentioned, for instance) that I miss in the DC as I feel they added much to the character and the story development.

Shipmate- 10-20-2007

NOW,you all have got me interested in wanting to see that other version! Sounds as though it might be worth a try. Think it would be hard to find now?(DC,I mean) Your banner was so sweet,Stevie, and I really like the old one too!-----------------Tell Scott "Welcome Home"!

Frances- 10-20-2007

No, I don't think the DC is hard to find. At least in my area, libraries and dvd rental stores usually carry both the theatrical and DC version of KA. Ah, welcome home, Scott.

Gaffer'sGirl- 10-20-2007

I agree with Frances. In fact the DC may be easier to find as it was released later. Hopefully, you can rent it, Shipmate.

Forumer™ is Voted #1 Free Forum Hosting provider
Build your own community today with the largest message board hosting company.